Amblyopia is very common in adults, with a US prevalence ranging between 1% and 4%. Lazy eye or amblyopia can […]
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of vision therapy in a school setting in which elementary school children, enrolled in a reading-mentoring program, Caring Adults Teaching Children How (CATCH), were trained as a group. The experimental goal was to improve visual-motor and visual perceptual skills, with the use of vision therapy in short sessions given weekly at school, to children with reading difficulties. Sixty students were selected after the use of the Developmental Eye Movement test’s (DEM) exclusion criteria and were randomly assigned into one of two groups: vision therapy and non-therapy. Both groups received CATCH tutorial visits once a week for 50 minutes. In addition, the therapy group received a weekly 30 minute activity session in which three activities were completed from the following: oculomotor, accommodation, binocularity, visual motor and visual memory. The results revealed that vertical and horizontal eye movements and accommodative facility were significantly improved after 22 sessions of group vision therapy. These improvements were related to attentional mechanisms leading to improved reading abilities. We believe this preliminary study gives evidence of the advantages of a program whereby vision therapy is provided in the elementary school setting to advance deficient visual skills that are related to learning and cognitive enhancement.
Developmental Eye Movement Vertical - There was a statistically significant improvement in vertical eye tracking in the therapy group compared to those not treated when tested at the midterm point, F (1,45) = 3.81, p< .05. As seen in Figure 1A, the therapy group at each grade level had a greater percentile vertical tracking score than the non-therapy group. End of year vertical tracking scores compared to midterm scores showed another significant treatment effect, that is, while each group improved their scores, the therapy group scores remained higher, F (1, 43) = 5.00, p< .03 (Figure 1B). When comparing all 3 vertical eye tracking scores, there was a significant improvement across the year for the group receiving therapy, F (1,43) = 4.92, p< .03, demonstrating a continued improvement in the therapy group. There was no significant difference between grades or treatment interaction with grade. Horizontal - Testing for horizontal eye tracking at mid year showed a statistically significant increase in performance for those receiving therapy, F (1, 46) = 5.54, p< .02 (Figure 2A). Midterm horizontal tracking scores compared to the final scores produced a statistically significant interaction between treatment group and time, F (1, 41) = 5.21, p< .03 (Figure 2B). This implies that, whereas the therapy group demonstrated most of their improvement in DEM-horizontal in the first half of the year, the non-therapy subjects had an equal amount of improvement occurring in the second half of the year.
I haven't actually used the optometrist side, so my review is limited to the vision therapy offered. This office was recommended by my occupational therapist for the treatment of my double vision following a stroke.
Love this location. I had a brain injury accident from day one one. All the team make you feel you still important and hope in the horizon after when the medical system fell you miserably. Dr. Ikeda very professional and very understanding about your issue. Two tombs up.
My husband and I were immediately impressed with Dr Ikeda. I was hit by a car while cycling which caused broken bones and three brain injuries. The brain injuries caused double vision. Dr. Ikeda examined my eyes and got me started on vision therapy with his occupational therapist who specializes in vision therapy. She (Chris) is absolutely great. I am impressed with the array of tools used to help recover my binocular vision. I am doing things I never thought were possible (balance boards etc). Chris pushes me and keeps me motivated. I really enjoy my sessions with her. The office staff is always friendly and they have a wonderful appointment reminder tool that makes it easy to keep my calendar up to date. I am happy the rehab center at Little Co. of Mary recommended them!!
The Vision Therapy is handled in a separate office through a different door from the shared waiting room. Chris, the vision therapist, has a wide and varied assortment of tools, equipment and resources to best evaluate and treat most vision issues. After just a few visits, my double vision became easier to control, using exercises developed during the therapy process. It was time well-spent.
I have been coming here since I can remember. I love it here. The staff is so amazing and nice. They explain everything they gonna do and never make you feel rushed. Dr. Ikeda has always been my doctor and I would never want another one. He is the doctor for my whole family and is always asking how everyone is doing. I am also so crazy about picking out my frames and have to try so many and each person who helps me take the time and lets me try them all on. I would never want to go anywhere else! I definitely would recommend this office to anyone looking for a great eye doctor.
It is estimated that 12 million Americans over the age of 40 have some form of vision impairment. Magnification devices […]
A significant percentage at least 10% to 20% of the population suffers from binocular vision dysfunction, yet almost no one […]